Missional Communities, Part 4
After reviewing the precedent literature in the areas of American exurbs, biblical hospitality and missional communities, I believe that there are transferable principles that can aid in the formation of missional communities in exurban America. There as well pitfalls and dangers that need to be examined also as leaders move toward implementation of these gleaned concepts.
In a reality defining act, the missional community must help people regain a theology of place. Exurbanites are constantly looking to where they must drive to work, to the next place they need to be, or to the next house they want or the place that they want to live. With what has been learned about the residents of the exurban areas it is safe to say that the vast majority are distracted and feel no real ownership in their communities. They see their time there as transitional so there is no need to be invested or at the end of the day they are just too tired.
The missional community then serves as a centering force for the exurbanite. They should become hubs of activity on the street or in the cul-de-sac. They are productive centers where exurbanites can look out of their window and see that something fruitful something good is happening here. This will help combat the prevalent notion that anything of value is always somewhere else.
Like Zacheus who was left to be a light where he was, missional communities must claim their space as redeemed people at street level. Jesus says that his father is always at work (John 5:17) and the missional community embraces this idea and looks for opportunities to join in.
Methodology here becomes important, as we are welcoming people out of the edges and into the presence and work of the King. The people of God have for years carried the three-step idea as a marker for what the process of hospitality looks like. The process involves evaluating the stranger, welcoming him or her as a guest and sending him or her out as a friend. I argue that this three-step process needs a fourth step as missional communities seek to impact the exurbs of America.
Evaluation is an essential; the community and its members must be honest about how they see individuals or families around them. The evaluation of the person(s) that we are pursuing with hospitality helps define who the person(s) really are and helps make them more human. It helps the community member to shelf pre-conceived notions about the person and from this day forward to treat them out of respect based upon who they really are. In the exurban context this may take multiple conversations, shared encounters or meals.
The next step of welcoming the stranger into our space leads to opportunities to know the person at a deeper level. It is hear that the guest is transitioned from stranger to friend as they are becoming more fully human to us. Here expectations levels are raised as the guest/friend and the host glean what they can expect from each other. Trust is built as tasks are shared or stories are exchanged.
It is at this point that I begin to argue for a difference in the pattern. The next step is to send them out as a friend with the caveat they comeback to become family. Our goal as Christians is to create family and in a world where friend can mean anything from a best friend, to a dating relationship, to an acquaintance at Starbucks, or to a networked person on Facebook we need to delineate that our goal is that the stranger eventually becomes a family member.
Family members are resourced differently, loved differently. They are sought out differently. They are tracked differently and contacted differently. They are held to accountability differently, at a higher level as more is expected from them. In all of these instances the standard is higher and our goal is to see each and every street become one big family of God. The missional community can facilitate this at street level if it has solid vision as to why it is there and what the ultimate goal is.
Families in the south, where I have lived all of my life, have family reunions. We get together and share meals and stories. We reflect on the time since we last gathered. My family does this yearly but the missional community with members that live within eyesight will do this more frequently both formally and informally do to proximity. The family must and will reunite when new family members are being added regularly and when there are stories to tell, needs to be met or hurts to be expressed. Simply put the missional community wants the stranger and the barbarian,
*To be seen for who they really are and given the opportunity to become fully human.
*To be welcomed as guests and for the guest and the host to be more fully known.
*To leave not as a stranger but as a friend recognizing the new bond that exists between them.
*To comeback and continue the relationship as family where the guest, the host and the larger community live, love, hope, dream, hurt, serve and worship together
This larger four-step map serves as a great guiding framework for the ultimate goal of the community but it does not speak to specific methodology. It is at this juncture that I believe that the methods of St. Patrick can have huge impact in how the missional community lives in the exurbs.

Sorry, Comments are Closed.